Josh, I have to agree with Sheilah I really like the way that you emulated Paul pFieffers work. I think that it really works well with the scene that you chose.
This posting is really cool. I like the way you just removed him from the film. It emulates the way the characters are supposed to act in the movie as well. Really good job.
This piece is ironic because you take something symbolic (the invisibility) and make it literal. Also, your choice of erasing the guy only was a very wise choice of effect to me. It reinforces the main character's superiority of knowledge over the young woman.
Great work Nick. I love the camera's following nature. Your work kept me thinking "how did he do that?!". You really capture a cold feeling, and rather mechanical, to the piece. Probably experimenting with monitors would of served good as well which, as you know, Nauman used in the Public/ Private space installation. R.T
Josh, this is a really good technical exercise where you have tried to emulate Paul Pfieffer's work. Good work. I think it works well.
ReplyDeleteSheilah
Josh, I have to agree with Sheilah I really like the way that you emulated Paul pFieffers work. I think that it really works well with the scene that you chose.
ReplyDeleteTyler
Josh, I'm so glad to see that you're looking at Paul Pfeiffer's work. You guys just seem to have so much in common, conceptually speaking :)
ReplyDeleteThis posting is really cool. I like the way you just removed him from the film. It emulates the way the characters are supposed to act in the movie as well. Really good job.
ReplyDeleteRG
This piece is ironic because you take something symbolic (the invisibility) and make it literal. Also, your choice of erasing the guy only was a very wise choice of effect to me. It reinforces the main character's superiority of knowledge over the young woman.
ReplyDeleteRamiro Trejo